Bedrock vs Supastarter: Enterprise SaaS Starters Compared
Enterprise Boilerplates, Different Generations
Bedrock and Supastarter both target developers building serious SaaS products. But they come from different eras of the JavaScript ecosystem and make fundamentally different bets on what "enterprise-ready" means.
Bedrock is Max Stoiber's Next.js and GraphQL boilerplate. Stoiber built Spectrum (acquired by GitHub), created styled-components, and authored react-boilerplate. Bedrock reflects that experience: a focused, opinionated codebase with magic link auth, Stripe billing, team management, and a type-safe GraphQL API. It ships what you need and nothing more. At $396 (one-time), it is a curated toolkit from someone who has scaled production SaaS.
Supastarter is Jonathan Wilke's integrated platform. It ships a Turborepo monorepo with auth, five payment providers, admin dashboard, background jobs, file storage, AI chatbot, i18n, blog, and CI/CD pipelines — all pre-wired and working from the first pnpm dev. Starting at $299 (one-time), it offers arguably the most complete feature set of any SaaS boilerplate on the market.
The comparison is really a question: do you want a refined foundation to build on, or a near-complete SaaS platform to customize?
TL;DR
Bedrock ($396, one-time) gives you a focused Next.js + GraphQL starter with magic link auth, Stripe billing, team management via projects, and Cypress testing. Supastarter ($299-$1,499, one-time) ships a complete monorepo platform with Better Auth (including passkeys), five payment providers, admin dashboard with impersonation, background jobs, file storage, AI chatbot, i18n, and GitHub Actions CI/CD. Choose Bedrock if you want a lean, GraphQL-first foundation from a battle-tested creator. Choose Supastarter if you want a feature-complete platform with enterprise-grade tooling out of the box.
Key Takeaways
- Supastarter starts at $299. Bedrock costs $396. Supastarter is cheaper at the solo tier and offers significantly more features. Bedrock has no team or agency pricing tiers.
- Architecture is the fundamental divide. Bedrock uses Next.js with a GraphQL API layer (Pothos + Prisma + urql). Supastarter uses a Turborepo monorepo with Hono + oRPC for type-safe REST endpoints and automatic OpenAPI spec generation.
- Auth approaches differ significantly. Bedrock uses Passport.js with magic link login. Supastarter uses Better Auth with password, magic links, OAuth, passkeys, and 2FA. If you need passkey or multi-factor authentication, Supastarter includes it natively.
- Payment provider count is lopsided. Bedrock supports Stripe only. Supastarter supports five providers: Stripe, Lemon Squeezy, Polar, Creem, and Dodo Payments.
- Supastarter ships enterprise features Bedrock does not include. Admin dashboard with user impersonation, RBAC, background jobs, file storage, i18n, blog system, onboarding flows, and Docker Compose for local development are all absent from Bedrock.
- Bedrock's creator pedigree is exceptional. Max Stoiber's production experience building and scaling Spectrum gives Bedrock architectural credibility that few solo-developer boilerplates can match.
- Framework support differs. Bedrock is Next.js only. Supastarter supports Next.js and Nuxt, with TanStack Start planned.
Quick Comparison
| Feature | Bedrock | Supastarter |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $396 one-time | $299 Solo / $799 Startup / $1,499 Agency |
| Framework | Next.js | Next.js, Nuxt |
| Architecture | Single app, GraphQL API | Monorepo (Turborepo), REST + oRPC |
| API layer | GraphQL (Pothos + urql) | Hono + oRPC (type-safe, OpenAPI) |
| Database | PostgreSQL (Prisma) | PostgreSQL (Prisma or Drizzle) |
| Auth | Passport.js (magic links, token-based) | Better Auth (password, magic links, OAuth, passkeys, 2FA) |
| Payments | Stripe | Stripe, Lemon Squeezy, Polar, Creem, Dodo |
| Multi-tenancy | Projects with billing + invites | Organizations, invites, RBAC, per-org billing |
| Admin panel | Not included | Super admin dashboard + impersonation |
| i18n | Not included | Yes (multi-language blog + legal pages) |
| Blog | Not included | MDX (multi-language, CMS-compatible) |
| Postmark | Multiple providers + customizable templates | |
| Testing | Cypress E2E | Playwright E2E |
| CI/CD | Pre-commit hooks only | GitHub Actions + pre-commit hooks |
| Docker | Not included | Docker Compose (PostgreSQL + MinIO S3) |
| Background jobs | Not included | trigger.dev + QStash cron |
| File storage | Not included | S3-compatible + presigned uploads |
| AI features | Not included | AI chatbot + Vercel AI SDK |
| Monitoring | Not included | Sentry |
| Onboarding flow | Not included | Multi-step onboarding |
| Legal pages | Not included | Privacy policy + ToS templates (multi-language) |
| TypeScript | Strict mode | Strict mode |
| Open source tier | No | No |
Pricing Breakdown
Bedrock
Bedrock offers a single tier:
- Standard — $396 one-time (regularly $450, currently discounted). One license per application. Access to private GitHub repository with full codebase and all future updates. 14-day money-back guarantee. Invite-only Discord community.
There are no team or agency tiers. If five developers need access, you purchase additional licenses. There is no documented volume pricing.
Supastarter
Supastarter offers three tiers:
- Solo — $299 one-time. One developer, unlimited personal projects, full SaaS stack, lifetime updates.
- Startup — $799 one-time. Up to 5 developers, unlimited team projects, 30-minute architecture consulting session, priority support.
- Agency — $1,499 one-time. Up to 10 developers, unlimited client projects, white-label rights, private Discord channel.
Supastarter also sells 60-minute architecture consulting sessions for $149 as a standalone add-on.
The Real Cost Difference
Supastarter's solo tier is $97 cheaper than Bedrock while including substantially more features. For teams, the gap widens: Supastarter's Startup plan covers 5 developers for $799 with a consulting session, while Bedrock would require multiple individual licenses at $396 each. The agency tier at $1,499 with white-label rights has no Bedrock equivalent.
Feature Comparison
Authentication
Bedrock uses Passport.js with magic link authentication — users receive an email link, no passwords stored. It also includes token-based API authentication for programmatic access. Secure and straightforward, but limited in options.
Supastarter uses Better Auth with email/password, magic links, OAuth, passkey support, and two-factor authentication. The RBAC system integrates directly with organization-level multi-tenancy.
If your product targets enterprise customers who mandate MFA or passkey support, Supastarter includes these natively. Adding them to Bedrock requires replacing or extending Passport.js.
Payments and Billing
Bedrock integrates Stripe exclusively with subscription billing, per-seat pricing, upgrade/downgrade flows, and automatic invoicing. Clean and sufficient if Stripe is your only provider.
Supastarter supports five providers: Stripe, Lemon Squeezy, Polar, Creem, and Dodo Payments. The billing system covers subscriptions, one-time payments, seat-based pricing, and customer portal creation. Five providers matters for global markets or Merchant of Record flexibility.
Multi-Tenancy and Team Management
Bedrock organizes users around "projects," each with its own billing and members. Functional multi-tenancy, but no RBAC, custom roles, or granular permissions.
Supastarter provides full organization-based multi-tenancy with RBAC, configurable roles, per-org billing, organization switching, and super admin impersonation. For B2B SaaS with enterprise team requirements, Supastarter is production-ready out of the box.
Admin, Content, and Infrastructure
The remaining feature gaps follow the same pattern. Bedrock does not include an admin panel, blog, landing page, legal templates, Docker configuration, CI/CD pipelines, background jobs, or file storage. You build these yourself.
Supastarter ships all of them: super admin dashboard with impersonation, MDX blog with multi-language support, SaaS landing page, legal page templates, Docker Compose (PostgreSQL + MinIO S3), GitHub Actions CI/CD, trigger.dev background jobs, QStash cron scheduling, and S3-compatible file storage with presigned uploads.
Architecture
Bedrock: GraphQL-First, Lean by Design
Bedrock's architecture reflects Max Stoiber's philosophy: include only what you need, make everything except Next.js removable, and keep the codebase small enough that one developer can understand all of it.
The GraphQL API is built with Pothos (schema builder) and Prisma (ORM). GraphQL Codegen generates typed React hooks, and the client uses urql with normalized caching. The entire stack is type-safe from database schema to React component. Most optional tools can be removed by deleting a single file or folder.
The trade-off: Bedrock is tightly coupled to GraphQL. If your team prefers REST or finds GraphQL unnecessary for your use case, removing it is not a single-file operation.
Supastarter: Integrated Monorepo Platform
Supastarter uses a Turborepo monorepo with separated packages: ai, api, auth, database, i18n, logs, mail, payments, storage, and ui. The API layer uses Hono with oRPC for type-safe endpoints that automatically generate OpenAPI specs — a significant advantage for public APIs and external integrations.
Everything is configured and working when you clone the repo. The trade-off is codebase size — unused packages still exist in your monorepo until you delete them.
Developer Experience
Bedrock ships with Cypress E2E testing, type-safe database seeding, pre-commit hooks, and VS Code settings pre-configured. It does not include CI/CD pipelines or AI-specific developer tooling.
Supastarter uses Playwright E2E testing with GitHub Actions CI/CD, Biome for linting, and Sentry for monitoring. It also ships AGENTS.md and claude.md files for AI coding agents, plus Cursor/Claude Code/Copilot optimization.
Both include Discord communities. Supastarter additionally offers architecture consulting ($149 for 60 minutes, or included in the Startup plan).
When to Choose Bedrock
- You prefer GraphQL. Bedrock's GraphQL-first architecture with Pothos, Prisma, and urql is well-integrated and type-safe. If your team is invested in GraphQL, Bedrock provides a production-tested foundation.
- You want a minimal starting point. Bedrock's philosophy is "minimal code necessary." If you dislike large boilerplates with features you will never use, Bedrock's lean codebase is easier to audit and understand.
- Creator credibility matters to you. Max Stoiber's track record — styled-components, react-boilerplate, Spectrum (acquired by GitHub) — provides confidence that the architectural decisions are informed by real production experience at scale.
- Your product is simple. If you are building a straightforward SaaS without complex multi-tenancy, i18n, or enterprise compliance requirements, Bedrock gives you auth, billing, and teams without the overhead of features you do not need.
- You want maximum control. Bedrock's modular architecture lets you swap or remove most tools easily. You build your own admin panel, blog, and deployment pipeline to your exact specifications.
Best for: Solo developers and small teams building GraphQL-powered SaaS products who value a lean codebase, architectural credibility, and the freedom to add complexity incrementally.
When to Choose Supastarter
- You need enterprise features out of the box. Admin dashboard with impersonation, RBAC, multi-tenancy with organizations, passkey auth, 2FA, background jobs, and audit-ready infrastructure are all included.
- You want everything pre-wired. Auth, payments, email, blog, admin, AI, background jobs, file storage, testing, CI/CD — all working together from
pnpm dev. No assembly required. - Multiple payment providers matter. Five providers (Stripe, Lemon Squeezy, Polar, Creem, Dodo Payments) cover more global markets and Merchant of Record options than Bedrock's Stripe-only approach.
- You are building for international markets. Multi-language support for the blog, legal pages, email templates, and UI — all pre-configured with a language switcher component.
- Your team needs shared access. The Startup ($799 for 5 developers) and Agency ($1,499 for 10 developers with white-label rights) tiers are designed for team and agency workflows.
- You need Nuxt support. Supastarter supports both Next.js and Nuxt. Bedrock is Next.js only.
- Docker and CI/CD are table stakes for you. Docker Compose for local development and GitHub Actions pipelines are included. Bedrock provides neither.
- You want a type-safe REST API. Hono + oRPC with automatic OpenAPI spec generation is a more universally compatible API approach than GraphQL.
Best for: Teams building feature-rich B2B SaaS products with enterprise requirements who want a complete, integrated platform and plan to use most of the included features.
Verdict
Bedrock and Supastarter serve different definitions of "enterprise-ready." Bedrock means enterprise-grade architecture from someone who shipped enterprise software. Supastarter means enterprise-grade features included out of the box.
At $396 versus $299, Supastarter is both cheaper and more feature-rich. The gap is substantial — Supastarter includes at least a dozen major capabilities that Bedrock does not ship. Bedrock's strengths are its lean architecture, GraphQL-first API design, and the proven judgment of its creator.
Choose Bedrock if you value simplicity, want a GraphQL API, and prefer to build your own tooling on a solid foundation. You are paying for architectural quality and the freedom to compose your stack your way.
Choose Supastarter if you want to start with a production-ready SaaS platform and spend your time on business logic instead of infrastructure. The feature completeness, lower price point, and multi-framework support make it the stronger choice for most enterprise SaaS projects.
Methodology
This comparison is based on publicly available information from both products' official websites, documentation, and pricing pages as of March 2026. Feature claims were verified against official documentation and third-party review sites. Pricing reflects standard publicly listed prices at the time of writing and may change. We have no affiliate relationship with either product.
Exploring more SaaS boilerplate options? Browse all boilerplates on StarterPick for side-by-side feature comparisons, community reviews, and stack analysis — so you can find the right foundation without the research rabbit hole.